When the Bhakti movement emerged in South India between the 7th and 10th centuries CE, it entered a religious landscape already deeply shaped by two dominant faiths – Jainism and Buddhism. Both had centuries of royal backing, institutional prestige, and philosophical authority. Yet the Bhakti saints, many of them from lower castes or marginalized communities, posed one of the most effective challenges these traditions had ever faced. Understanding that challenge means looking at both the power structures Bhakti dismantled and the socio-religious space it opened up for those who had long been excluded.

A landscape of religious power
Why Jainism and Buddhism became targets
The rejection of austerity as a path to liberation
The Alvars and Nayanars: voices from the margins
Bhakti as a counter-narrative to elite religion
Subaltern voices and the limits of Bhakti’s radicalism
What Bhakti’s partial radicalism meant for Dalits
The reshaping of South India’s socio-religious landscape

A landscape of religious power

Before the Bhakti movement took hold, Jainism and Buddhism were far from peripheral beliefs in South India. They enjoyed direct access to political authority. According to Britannica, the Digambara sect of Jainism secured the patronage of three major South Indian dynasties – the Gangas in Karnataka (3rd-11th century), the Rashtrakutas (8th-12th century), and the Hoysalas (11th-14th century). Digambara monks are even credited with influencing royal succession in the Ganga and Hoysala dynasties, effectively guaranteeing Jain political protection through the highest levels of governance. This was not simply religious popularity – it was structural power.

As historian Dr. Amit Dey of the University of Calcutta notes, the Bhakti saints were sharply critical of Jains and Buddhists who enjoyed a privileged status at the courts of South Indian monarchs during that period. The two traditions had, by then, become rigid and formal – increasingly inaccessible to ordinary people. This is the context in which Bhakti arrived: not as a gentle spiritual movement, but as a direct counter to institutionalized religious authority.

Why Jainism and Buddhism became targets

Both Jainism and Buddhism carried genuine reformist ideals at their origins. But over centuries, their relationship with royal patronage and merchant elites had reshaped their social character. Historical records show that it was largely state patronage that kept Jainism influential in South India, and that without it the faith faced decline. Jainism’s strict codes – extreme asceticism, rigid conduct, doctrines accessible mainly to monks and the educated – had grown distant from everyday life. Buddhism, similarly, had become tied to monastic elites and was losing popular resonance in the region.

The Bhakti saints were critical of Buddhists and Jains precisely because they occupied privileged positions at royal courts. This was not merely theological disagreement. It was a challenge to who got to define the spiritual and social order, and who was permanently left outside it. From the vantage of subaltern communities – including those regarded as “untouchable” – both Jainism and Buddhism, whatever their original egalitarian impulses, had become part of an exclusionary elite.

The rejection of austerity as a path to liberation

The Nayanars and Alvars rejected the austerities preached by the Jains and Buddhists, arguing that personal devotion to God – not rigorous self-denial or monastic discipline – was the only path to salvation. This was a pointed philosophical rebuke. Jainism’s ideal of extreme asceticism and Buddhism’s Middle Path still required a level of withdrawal from ordinary life that was simply unavailable to those who labored in fields, served in households, or were excluded from temples entirely. The Bhakti argument was direct: you did not need a priest as intermediary, you did not need to master Sanskrit texts, and you did not need to renounce the world. What mattered was the sincerity of your devotion.

The Alvars and Nayanars: voices from the margins

The most important carriers of the Bhakti challenge were the Alvars (Vaishnava poet-saints devoted to Vishnu) and the Nayanars (Shaiva poet-saints devoted to Shiva). Originating in Tamilakam in the 6th century CE, the movement gained prominence through their poems and teachings before spreading northward. What makes their contribution so significant, especially from a Dalit philosophical perspective, is who these saints were.

There were 63 Nayanars, who came from backgrounds as varied as potters, peasants, hunters, soldiers, workers classified as “untouchable,” and Brahmanas. The 12 Alvars similarly came from divergent social positions. Figures like Nammalvar, widely considered the greatest of the Alvars, came from a lower-caste background and spent his life in fasting and meditation, composing four series of verses that Vaishnavites regard as equivalent to the four Vedas. The disciples of these saints – bhaktas – came from a wide range of social backgrounds, including castes considered “untouchable” like the Pulaiyar and Panars.

This was radical not just symbolically but structurally. The Bhakti tradition placed people from the lowest rungs of the caste order into positions of spiritual authority – their hymns sung in temples, their teachings forming the basis of major theological systems. This created a powerful counter-narrative of spiritual inclusivity, even if it did not abolish caste altogether.

Bhakti as a counter-narrative to elite religion

The Bhakti saints composed and preached in Tamil, not Sanskrit. The Alvars composed the Nalayira Divya Prabandham (“Four Thousand Divine Verses”), which became central to the Vaishnava tradition, while the Nayanars’ hymns were compiled in the Tirumurai. Composing in the vernacular was itself a political act. Sanskrit was the language of Brahmin priests, of Buddhist and Jain scholarly texts – in short, the language of those already inside the walls of power. Tamil was the language of everyone else.

The Bhakti saints resisted the authority of orthodox Brahmanas by making devotion accessible to all without caste or gender discrimination. Women saints also emerged within this tradition – Andal, the only female Alvar, and Nayanar saints like Karaikkal Ammaiyar – representing a break from both Brahmanical and Jain-Buddhist religious orders that confined women to marginal roles.

Perhaps most significantly, several Nayanars actively engaged in polemics against Buddhism and Jainism. Sambandar, for instance, is credited with converting the Pandya king from Jainism back to Shaivism – a symbolic moment that illustrated the competition between these religious traditions for royal patronage and popular support. Bhakti was not content to exist alongside Jain and Buddhist power; it actively sought to displace it at the level of political legitimacy.

Subaltern voices and the limits of Bhakti’s radicalism

It is important to assess the Bhakti movement’s challenge to Jainism and Buddhism honestly – including its limitations. As Dr. Dey’s analysis makes clear, the Bhakti saints’ principal targets were Jains and Buddhists, not the Brahmanical caste system itself. The movement never consciously challenged the varna system at a social level. One-third of the Nayanars and Alvars were Brahmanas by birth. Brahmin-dominated temples played a key role in the growth of the South Indian Bhakti movement, and after the movement reached its zenith in the 10th century, it was gradually absorbed into mainstream Brahmanical religion.

This tension is crucial for understanding Bhakti from a Dalit philosophical standpoint. The movement undeniably created space for subaltern voices – it insisted on the spiritual worth of those society had declared worthless, and it gave lower-caste and outcaste saints a platform of genuine cultural authority. In its heyday, the South Indian Bhakti movement succeeded in championing the cause of religious equality, compelling even Brahmins to accept the right of lower-caste people to preach and access devotional practice. But it did not dismantle the ideological foundations of caste. In the long run, it was integrated into – and arguably strengthened – the hierarchical structures it had once challenged.

What Bhakti’s partial radicalism meant for Dalits

For communities at the very bottom of the social order, the Bhakti movement offered something real and something incomplete at the same time. It offered spiritual dignity – the assertion that devotion, not birth, determined one’s relationship to the divine. Saints from outcaste backgrounds were venerated, their poetry enshrined as sacred scripture. Most scholars acknowledge that the Bhakti movement provided women and members of the Shudra and untouchable communities an inclusive path to spiritual salvation.

Yet the social conditions that created exclusion – landlessness, enforced labor, the denial of public space – remained largely intact. The Bhakti saints opened a door to the sacred, but did not tear down the walls that kept Dalit communities confined in the secular world. Seen in this light, Bhakti’s challenge to Jaina and Buddhist political power was simultaneously a genuine rupture and a limited one. It redistributed spiritual authority without redistributing social power.

The reshaping of South India’s socio-religious landscape

Despite its contradictions, the Bhakti movement’s impact on South India’s religious geography was lasting and transformative. The Alvar and Nayanar traditions fueled a major expansion of temple culture – new temples dedicated to Vishnu and Shiva were built, and the poet-saints’ hymns became a regular part of temple worship. These temples, for all their eventual Brahmanical consolidation, were originally conceived as spaces open to devotees across caste lines.

The Bhakti movement of South India succeeded in replacing heterodox faiths like Buddhism and Jainism with temple-centered devotional practices, fundamentally altering who held religious legitimacy in the region. Buddhism effectively faded from South India during this period. Jainism, though it survived, was steadily pushed to the margins – losing its position at the royal courts it had dominated for centuries. That shift was not incidental. It was the product of a sustained, deliberate counter-movement that spoke in the language of the people, elevated figures from the margins, and made the question of who belongs in sacred space a genuinely contested one.

The Tamil devotional compositions of the Alvars and Nayanars continue to be performed in temples and homes throughout South India today – a living continuity with a movement that once challenged the most powerful religious institutions of its time. That the challenge was imperfect does not diminish what it achieved. It does, however, remind us that the work of genuine inclusion – the kind that reaches into the social, not just the spiritual – remained unfinished.

What do you think? If the Bhakti movement ultimately reinforced Brahmanical structures despite opening devotional space to lower-caste communities, can it still be considered a meaningful assertion of Dalit philosophical agency? And what does it tell us about the difference between spiritual inclusion and genuine social liberation?

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating / 5. Vote count:

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

References

PDF 📄

Bhakti’s Challenge to Jaina and Buddhist Dominance in South India

Share on Mastodon

Bhakti’s Challenge to Jaina and Buddhist Dominance in South India

Table of Contents

A landscape of religious power 🔗

Why Jainism and Buddhism became targets 🔗

The rejection of austerity as a path to liberation 🔗

The Alvars and Nayanars: voices from the margins 🔗

Bhakti as a counter-narrative to elite religion 🔗

Subaltern voices and the limits of Bhakti’s radicalism 🔗

What Bhakti’s partial radicalism meant for Dalits 🔗

The reshaping of South India’s socio-religious landscape 🔗